Dr EMMA ADAMS Emma.Adams@nottingham.ac.uk
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Dr EMMA ADAMS Emma.Adams@nottingham.ac.uk
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Anna E. Chalkley
Dale W. Esliger
Lauren B. Sherar
Background
Promoting walking for the journey to/from work and during the working day is one potential approach to increase physical activity in adults. Walking Works was a practice-led, whole-workplace walking programme delivered by employees (walking champions). This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of Walking Works using the RE-AIM framework and provide recommendations for future delivery of whole-workplace walking programmes.
Methods
Two cross sectional surveys were conducted; 1544 (28%) employees completed the baseline survey and 918 employees (21%) completed the follow-up survey. Effectiveness was assessed using baseline and follow-up data; reach, implementation and maintenance were assessed using follow-up data only. For categorical data, Chi square tests were conducted to assess differences between surveys or groups. Continuous data were analysed to test for significant differences using a Mann-Whitney U test. Telephone interviews were conducted with the lead organisation co-ordinator, eight walking champions and three business representatives at follow-up. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed to identify key themes related to adoption, implementation and maintenance.
Results
Adoption: Five workplaces participated in Walking Works. Reach: 480 (52.3%) employees were aware of activities and 221 (24.1%) participated. Implementation: A variety of walking activities were delivered. Some programme components were not delivered as planned which was partly due to barriers in using walking champions to deliver activities. These included the walking champions’ capacity, skills, support needs, ability to engage senior management, and the number and type of activities they could deliver. Other barriers included lack of management support, difficulties communicating information about activities and challenges embedding the programme into normal business activities. Effectiveness: No significant changes in walking to/from work or walking during the working day were observed. Maintenance: Plans to continue activities were mainly dependent on identifying continued funding.
Conclusions
RE-AIM provided a useful framework for evaluating Walking Works. No changes in walking behaviour were observed. This may have been due to barriers in using walking champions to deliver activities, programme components not being delivered as intended, the types of activities delivered, or lack of awareness and participation by employees. Recommendations are provided for researchers and practitioners implementing future whole-workplace walking programmes.
Adams, E. J., Chalkley, A. E., Esliger, D. W., & Sherar, L. B. (2017). Evaluation of the implementation of a whole-workplace walking programme using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Public Health, 17(1), Article 466. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4376-7
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 7, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | May 18, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2017-12 |
Deposit Date | Feb 3, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 4, 2022 |
Journal | BMC Public Health |
Electronic ISSN | 1471-2458 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 466 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4376-7 |
Keywords | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7357839 |
Publisher URL | https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-017-4376-7 |
Adams 2017 BMCPH WW REAIM AF 2
(175 Kb)
PDF
Adams 2017 BMCPH WW REAIM AF 1
(101 Kb)
PDF
Adams 2017 BMCPH WW REAIM
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search